cti-interoperability — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments
Koji
thanks for the confirmation.
Regarding the intentional blank. Are you suggesting we need to make a change to the template document ? Please clarify.
For other organizations awareness. These documents have yet to be formally approved by the TC and STIXPreferred program requires that they are approved.
After the next TC monthly meeting there will be a ballot for TC-approval of the documents.
If you need more time for your organization (and particularly your legal counsel) to review the documents please consider doing that now rather than waiting until the ballot comes out.
regards
Allan Thomson
CTO ( +1-408-331-6646)
LookingGlass Cyber Solutions
From:
Interoperability Subcommittee <[email protected]> on behalf of "Yamada, Koji" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 6:53 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Allan Thomson <[email protected]>, Ron Williams <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: Interoperability Subcommittee <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments
Hi Allan,
It took a lot of time,
our legal team (Fujitsu) reviewed the documents and it is OK
except intentional blank (such as [admin-email-address]).
Thank you.
Regards,
--------------------------------------------------
Fujitsu System Integration Laboratories
Koji Yamada
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Masuoka, Ryusuke
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 10:31 AM
To: 'Allan Thomson' <[email protected]>; Ron Williams <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [cti] RE: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments
Hi, Allan,
Thank you. Got the idea and the sense of urgency.
Will start working on immediately.
Regards,
Ryu
From:
[email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] ]
On Behalf Of Allan Thomson
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 10:13 PM
To: Masuoka, Ryusuke/ çå
çä < [email protected] >; Ron Williams < [email protected] >;
[email protected]
Cc:
[email protected] ;
[email protected] ;
[email protected]
Subject: [cti] Re: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments
Ryu
Our goal is to ensure the TC has time to review and provide feedback on the documents. It does no one any good if we have documents/framework for STIX Preferred that are either not reviewed at all or worse not acceptable to the majority
of the TC.
My goal of setting up milestones for review was to initiate an urgency to getting legal teams involved as I know * exactly * how long some legal departments take to review documents.
So thank you to everyone that has initiated that review quickly.
For the ballot the tentative plan was to initiate the start of the ballot over the next couple of weeks.
Allan Thomson
CTO
+1-408-331-6646
LookingGlass Cyber Solutions
From:
" [email protected] " < [email protected]
>
Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 6:46 PM
To: Allan Thomson < [email protected] >, Ron Williams < [email protected] >, " [email protected] "
< [email protected]
>
Cc: Interoperability Subcommittee < [email protected] >, " [email protected] " < [email protected] >,
" [email protected] " < [email protected]
>
Subject: RE: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments
Hi, Alan,
When do you estimate the end of the ballot period?
We will try our best to get it through our legal by then,
but it usually takes a month (and already a day or two have
already passed ).
Regards,
Ryu
From:
[email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] ]
On Behalf Of Allan Thomson
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:56 PM
To: Ron Williams < [email protected] >;
[email protected]
Cc:
[email protected] ;
[email protected] ;
[email protected]
Subject: [cti] Re: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments
Hi Ron
The intent is that this 1 week period + the ballot period will allow overall sufficient time for review/comments.
regards
Allan
From:
Ron Williams < [email protected]
>
Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM
To: " [email protected] " < [email protected]
>
Cc: Allan Thomson < [email protected] >, Interoperability Subcommittee < [email protected] >, " [email protected] "
< [email protected] >, " [email protected] " < [email protected]
>
Subject: Re: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments
Agree with Bret - especially if we engage our legal dept.
Cheers!
~r
[email protected]
stsm
chief architect x-force exchange master inventor
ibm
mobile +1.512.633.7711]
"
May you live as long as you want, and love as long as you
live
" - Robert Heinlein
http://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
preferred contact: on
Slack @ronwilliams
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]