Re: [cti] Interoperability poll regarding self-certification and possible TC review process

[Sarah Kelley <Sarah.Kelley@cisecurity.org>]

What if the answer is “We should do it.”, and the answer to the second question is “But we can’t”?

Sarah Kelley
Senior Cyber Threat Analyst
Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC)
31 Tech Valley Drive
East Greenbush, NY 12061

sarah.kelley@cisecurity.org
518-266-3493
24x7 Security Operations Center
SOC@cisecurity.org - 1-866-787-4722

 <https://msisac.cisecurity.org/>
        <https://www.facebook.com/CenterforIntSec>     <https://twitter.com/CISecurity>    <https://www.youtube.com/user/TheCISecurity>     <https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-center-for-internet-security>

On 4/20/17, 1:14 PM, "cti@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Allan Thomson" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of athomson@lookingglasscyber.com> wrote:

    To be clear on the ask.

    We are asking for people to vote based on what the community *should* do.

    If you agree that we should verify/review interop self-certification results then the 2nd step will be to figure out how to accomplish that.

    Please do not conflate these separate questions.

    allan

    On 4/20/17, 9:00 AM, "Trey Darley" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of trey@kingfisherops.com> wrote:

        All -

        During today's TC call Jason Keirstead and Allan Thomson
        (Interoperability SC co-chairs) posed the question of how the TC
        should approach self-certification and whether there should be some
        form of review by the CTI TC. In order to assess the general consensus
        we have created this poll [1].

        It's a simple poll which will probably take you 15 seconds to complete
        so please take a moment to make your voice heard. (The poll will close
        this Friday at midnight UTC.)

        [1]: https://goo.gl/forms/zmBTtjUCcyer30si2

        --
        Cheers,
        Trey
        ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
        Kingfisher Operations, sprl
        gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4  5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
        ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
        --
        "Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and a
        different presentation, regardless of whether it works." --RFC 1925



    ...


This message and attachments may contain confidential information. If it appears that this message was sent to you by mistake, any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and attachments is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments.

. . .