dita — archive

Integrate glossary reference domain into bookmap?

From: Kristen Eberlein <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:56:00 -0000

So, what are the implications for whether we integrate the glossary reference domain into bookmap ? I d think that a common glossary would be contained in a map, so no need for <glossarylist> to contain <glossref> ... Kris Sent from my iPad > On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Scott Hudson <[email protected]> wrote: > > ïA common glossary for a deliverable would make more sense at the bookmap level, than individual maps. This is especially true for terms that might be used across chapter maps. > > --Scott > > ïOn 10/7/19, 12:27 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > Do we want to do this as part of the revised stage two proposal for bookmap? > > If so, what are the use cases that support adding the domain to bookmap? > > The one that I've heard so far is to be able to have <glossref> elements > within <glossarylist> ... I'm not so sure about this, as I would think > that most glossaries would be in maps or <glossgroup> topics. > > -- > Best, > Kris > > Kristen James Eberlein > Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee > Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting > www.eberleinconsulting.com > +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.oasis-2Dopen.org_apps_org_workgroup_portal_my-5Fworkgroups.php&d=DwICaQ&c=P3aKjizb3qsxp0SERaL2sw&r=YQWdLfM9mekBOdoMmoBdn9RgyqIHrveGolBbb4_uGWQ&m=zmL_FFbBK6yV3DA_ZN-BVlx2clLvVREkHwih_x3L9C0&s=Rhwi23EbDpZu8fLraTHdWpa10lESnOGD_ExFkBJg_Wg&e= > > >