[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Missing CDATA sections
/ fyl2xp1 <vnhu38f93@subdimension.com> was heard to say:
| If I process this file:
|
| <?xml version="1.0"?>
| <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN" "c:/docbook/docbkx412/docbookx.dtd">
| <article>
| <sect1><title>Error Prone</title>
| <![CDATA[
| Im going to dissapear!
| ]]>
| <para>
| Yes that's right ladies and gentlemen, CDATA is gone!
| </para>
| </sect1>
| </article>
|
| with /docbook-xsl-1.52.2/profiling/profile.xsl using xsltproc
| it generates
|
| <?xml version="1.0"?>
| <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN" "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.0/docbookx.dtd">
| <article>
| <sect1><title>Error Prone</title>
|
| Im going to dissapear!
|
| <para>
| Yes that's right ladies and gentlemen, CDATA is gone!
| </para>
| </sect1>
| </article>
|
| which is not even valid XML, why is CDATA going missing, is this an xsltproc or
| style-sheet issue?
Uhm, it wasn't valid with the CDATA section marker either, so I'm confused.
<![CDATA[ is effectively a typing shortcut for character escaping. It
has *no* semantic meaning. It isn't even preserved in the XML infoset.
<![CDATA[<]]> and < are semantically *identical*.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If we could read the secret
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | history of our enemies, we should
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | find in in each one's life sorrow
| and suffering enough to disarm all
| hostility.--H. W. Longfellow
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC