[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: need help with Passivetex errors (part 1 of 2))
Oh, I see part of the problem: when I resent the attachment, I failed to
send it to the DocBook APPS list. Let's try this again.
The attached zip file contains the results of my processing a test XML file
through XSLTPROC and then through PassiveTeX. I have the PassiveTeX
extensions set. For this test, I left the nominal.table.width at the
default value (6"). I also tried this test with nominal.table.width set at
5.5", with the same results. Shouldn't that take care of any relative table
width problems?
Note, the table on page 4 of the PDF.
I'll follow this message with the log (the mailer won't accept a zip of
both files). Note the question marks that start popping up at around line
643 in the .log file:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again>
\fotable5:3
l.715 ...ble-row></fo:table-header><fo:table-body>
<fo:table-row><fo:table-ce...
?
! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
<to be read again>
\fotable5:3
l.715 ...ble-row></fo:table-header><fo:table-body>
<fo:table-row><fo:table-ce...
?
What does that mean, anyway? I get 72 occurrences of this type of error,
but only when I include the table in the document.
(See attached file: pdferr.zip)
Dennis Grace
Information Developer
IBM Linux Technology Center
(512) 838-3937 T/L 678-3937 cell: (512)-296-7830
dgrace@us.ibm.com
There are only 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary
and those who don't.
Norman Walsh
<ndw@nwalsh.com> To: Sebastian Rahtz <[email protected]>
cc: Dennis Grace/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Janning Vygen <vygen@gmx.de>,
09/11/2002 03:13 docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
PM Subject: Re: need help with Passivetex errors (part 1 of 2))
/ Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> was
heard to say:
| I am very aware that PassiveTeX has serious problems rendering tables.
| It does do a plausible job if you supply column widths, of course,
| but I don't think the Docbook stuff does this. In the TEI stylesheets
| I work out column widths when I make FO.
If you have extensions enabled and you specify the
nominal.table.width, then you'll get absolute column widths.
Sebastian, if you found a way to deal with relative column widths
(width="3*+2pc") without an extension function, I'd be delighted to
steal the code :-)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | 'tis expressly against the law of
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | arms: 'tis as arrant a piece of
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | knavery, mark you now, as can be
| offer't; in your conscience, now,
| is it not?--Fluellen, Henry V
Attachment:
pdferr.zip
Description: Zip archive
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC