Re: [docbook-apps] Typograhpical treatment of glossterms

[Bob Stayton <bobs@sco.com>]

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Joachim Ziegler wrote:
> I'm just wondering why a (inline) glossterm without a linkend gets 
> special typographical treatment in HTML and FO output whereas one with a 
> linkend gets not. (?)

I see this problem on the FO side, but the HTML side is all
italic as far as I can see.  Can you give an example
of a file where the HTML inlines are different?

I think the FO side is a bug, since all other cases for
inline glossterm use the 'inline.italseq' template,
except that one that uses 'inline.charseq'.

-- 

Bob Stayton                                 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect                      Santa Cruz, CA  95060
Technical Publications                      voice: (831) 427-7796
The SCO Group                               fax:   (831) 429-1887
                                            email: bobs@sco.com