Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Including <b> and <i> in XHTML stylesheets

[Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>]

Keith Fahlgren wrote:

> Looking at every single instance above, I don't see a single one that
> should remain a <b> or <i> instead of being either removed or changed
> to <strong> or <em>. Does anyone want to argue why <b> and <i> should
> be preserved for 1.76.1?

Maybe I have missed some previous discussion, but what's the reason for
changing <b>/<i> into <strong>/<em>?

Also please note that HTML5 is not so antagonistic about <b> and <i> as
HTML4:

http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/text-level-semantics.html#the-i-element

			Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

OpenPGP digital signature