docbook-tc — archive

[System]

Norman Walsh wrote: > > How about an agenda? :-) > > 1. Promote DocBook V4.1 (SGML) to a Committee Specification > 2. Promote DocBook XML V4.1.2 (XML) to a Committee Specification > 3. Should we make a simple DocBook subset an official work item? > 4. Can we/should we make docbook.org the official DocBook website? > (now that OASIS has diluted it's brand with xml.org, ebxml.org, etc. > I'm more in favor...) If I were a voting member I'd vote against the last item. The dilution reflects a different organizational arrangement. There is no such arrangement with docbook -- it is a fully compliant OASIS TC, within the boundaries of OASIS, so I don't see any reason why it should not live under OASIS proper... Eduardo > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> A new scientific truth does not > http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ triumph by convincing its > Chair, DocBook Technical Committee opponents and making them see the > light, but rather because its > opponents eventually die, and a > new generation grows up that is > familiar with it (Planck 1949) -- Eduardo Gutentag e-mail: eduardo@eng.Sun.COM XML Technology Center Phone: (650) 786-5498 Sun Microsystems Inc. fax: (650) 786-5727