docbook-tc — archive

Re: [docbook-tc] Are the Schematron assertions normative in 5.0?

From: Jirka Kosek
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:33:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















docbook-tc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Are the Schematron assertions normative in 5.0?




From: Jirka Kosek <[email protected]>
To: Norman Walsh <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:33:06 +0200






Norman Walsh wrote:

> I could go either way, but we should decide.

AFAIK Schematron should be formally standardized by ISO soon (well, yes 
*soon* in ISO's point of view could be one year). ISO Schematron uses 
different namespace than Rick's original version. It might be better to 
make Schematron assertions normative after Schematron gets ISO standard 
status. But I don't have very strong opinion about this.

					Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jirka Kosek     e-mail: [email protected]     http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
      Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
        Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Nejbližší termíny školení: DocBook 5.-7.12. * XSL-FO 19.-20.12.
      XSLT 17.-20.10. * XML schémata (včetně RELAX NG) 7.-9.11.
------------------------------------------------------------------


S/MIME Cryptographic Signature





Follow-Ups:

Re: [docbook-tc] Are the Schematron assertions normative in 5.0?
From: Norman Walsh <[email protected]>



References:

Are the Schematron assertions normative in 5.0?
From: Norman Walsh <[email protected]>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]