docbook-tc — archive

Version reference for DocBook Publishers documents?

From: David Pawson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:33:00 -0000

On 1 February 2011 18:24, Scott Hudson <[email protected]> wrote: > How shall DocBook Publishers documents be versioned? Should it be similar to > simplified, such that: > > 5.0-extension publishers-1.0 I've always expected the version to be numeric Scott? Equally, is @version used anywhere such that it would make it clear that I am processing pubs rather than plain docbook? > > It is not a true subset of DocBook 5.0, due to the additions of Dublin Core, > speaker, line, linegroup, drama, dialogue, and poetry. For which TDG is clear. "Don't call it docbook" Bit late now, but renaming the document element to x-pubs, where x is book/article/... perhaps? Or simpler, just give it a clear / different name, then use docbook ns etc? First time for docbook I guess. Is website a fair comparison? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk