Re: [docbook-tc] Proposed change to scheme versioning

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
> On 13 January 2012 20:53, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
>> Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org> writes:
>>> Indeed there are approved OASIS naming conventions. They are spelled
>>> out in the Naming Directives at:
>>>
>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives-v1.1.html
>>
>> I thought that applied to the naming of specification documents, not
>> ancillary files such as schemas.
>
> One view is that the output of Oasis Docbook TC is the schema?

Sure, but we also produce a specification that points to a number of
ancillary files: RELAX NG schemas (compact and XML), XML Schemas,
Schematron schemas, etc.

I have no problem naming the standards document according to the OASIS
rules, but I'm less sanguine about applying those rules to every
artifact.


                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | Man is an intellectual animal, and
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | therefore an everlasting
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | contradiction to himself. His
                                   | senses centre in himself, his
                                   | ideas reach to the ends of the
                                   | universe; so that he is torn to
                                   | pieces between the two, without a
                                   | possibility of its ever being
                                   | otherwise.-- Hazlitt

Attachment: pgpLB8ZcPJKBo.pgp
Description: PGP signature