Re: [docbook-tc] assembly info proposal

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

"Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net> writes:
> 2. For content intended to be included in the output, I would suggest
> <merge> instead of <override>. Whatever content is in merge is
> intended to be merged with the resources to generate the output.
> Exactly how it is merged is up the local application.

I'm happy with <merge> instead of <override>, but I still have a
preference for <info> as the wrapper for metadata about the element in
which it appears. That's what it means *everywhere else*. Yes, some
authors will get it wrong sometimes. And they won't get the results
they expect and they'll fix it.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | What are the thoughts of the
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | canvas on which a masterpiece is
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | being created? "I am being soiled,
                                   | brutally treated and concealed
                                   | from view." Thus men grumble at
                                   | their destiny, however fair.--Jean
                                   | Cocteau

Attachment: pgpKwtwZvI2dF.pgp
Description: PGP signature