docbook-tc — archive

Re: [docbook-tc] relatedlink element?

From: Norman Walsh <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 17:15:00 -0000

"Bob Stayton" <[email protected]> writes: > I've reviewed all the minutes and the mail archive, and it appears > that relatedlink was never approved. It came up in 2010 during the > development of the topic and assembly elements. The TC minutes discuss > adding it as an inline element, and there was a discussion of > reltables which we developed samples for but found too complicated and > postponed until after 5.1 Then we got into discussing the > relationships element in assembly, and there was no more mention of > relatedlink. Did we decide to not pursue relatedlink, or did we simply > forget about it? I'm afraid I don't recall. Larry, in your mind, does relatedlink fulfill a role that we're missing? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <[email protected]> Everything has been said before, http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ but since nobody every listens we Chair, DocBook Technical Committee have to keep going back and beginning all over again.--André Gide Attachment: pgpLlOHh0Pl5m.pgp Description: PGP signature