Fwd: [docbook] Status of bug #281: allow xi:include in set

[Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net>]

I just checked the latest schemas that Norm uploaded to OASIS, and it 
appears that this is indeed a bug.

In all other instances of xi:include in the DB XInclude schema, the 
xi:include was part of a pattern named db.*.content or db.*.components, 
and then that pattern is used with a repeatable suffix in the element 
definition.  But in set, we have:

db.set.components =
  ((db.set | db.book)+ | db.article+)
  | db.xi.include

    element set {
      db.set.attlist,
      db.set.info,
      db.toc.components?,
      db.set.components,
      db.setindex.components?
    }

That only allows a single xi:include in place of other elements.  We 
must allow more than one, and we must allow a mix of xi:include and 
elements.

Bob


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[docbook] Status of bug #281: allow xi:include in set
Date: 	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:07:30 -0500
From: 	Test User <testuser448@gmail.com>
To: 	docbook@lists.oasis-open.org



Hello All,

It was reported that xi:include was not allowed in <set>. At
http://sourceforge.net/p/docbook/rfes/281/ it says that the bug is
"fixed for 5.1".

When jing validates my document against the DocBook 5.1CR3 RELAX NG
schema (docbookxi.rng), it reports:
docs.xml:8:34: error: element "xi:include" not allowed here; expected
the element end-tag or element "setindex"


    ,----
    | <?xml version="1.0"?>
    | <set xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";
    |      xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
    |      xml:lang="en"
    |      version="5.0">
    |   <info>
    |     <title>Set title</title>
    |   </info>
    |   <xi:include href="book1.xml"/>
    |   <xi:include href="book2.xml"/> <!-- line 8 -->
    | </set>
    `----
The document will validate if there is only one xi:include in the <set>
so the sample document above is illegal.

Is there in fact a version of the DocBook schema that will accept the
document above?

Regards,
Test User.