[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: jade demo.sgm
[ Follow-ups to docbook-apps, please ]
/ cjwyche <cjwyche@io.com> was heard to say:
| Solaris 2.5.1 and jade 1.1 fail in jade/dsssl/ doing the
| demo. I seek answers to 4 questions. The details are shown
| at http://www.io.com/~cjwyche/mvc/gw_n_jade.html
| 1. Is the not having "DSSSL architecture" as a base an error
| for the demo?
You have to tell Jade that stylesheet you want to use.
jade demo.sgm
isn't sufficient. You need to say at least
jade -d /path/to/styledocument demo.sgm
And the styledocument has to have a doctype declaration that
ultimately includes the DSSSL architecture DTDs.
| 2. How am I to know if the resulting demo.fot is correct?
If you don't get any errors from Jade. There's no validator for FOTs.
| 3. Where do I find switch option descriptions?
http://www.jclark.com/
| 4. The openjade "list" seems to be 6 developers as opposed
| to users. What email lists do you suggest I engage for
| getting ideas about solutions for docbooks problems I expect
| I will be encountering?
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org and/or [email protected]
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The formula 'Two and two make
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | five' is not without its
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | attractions.--Dostoevsky
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC