[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Accommodating articles.
I've been looking into using DocBook <article>s as a possible vehicle for
journal manuscripts. For the most part I think it has the
potential to be a good fit, but there are just a few issues which are
troublesome.
(1) There seems to be no <articleinfo> container to hold the name of
the journal in which the article has been or will be published.
This seemed an unusual oversight because <volume> <pages> <issue>
<date> already exist.
I guess it would be called <publication>. Ideally the
content model would contain a title or more often an
abbreviated title of the journal, Maybe both?
(2) It would be useful to have a formal <contact> element within
<authorgroup>, typically, but not always one of the authors
of the article. It would therefore need the same content
as <author>, but probably wouldn't be displayed by default.
(3) <authorgroup><author> needs to allow <footnote>
The reason is that sometimes authors move on, to the afterlife or
new laboratories/positions and it is important and respectful
to note such things, but not within the main body of the article.
Actually I noticed some publications put the complete author
address as a footnote, appropriately <footnoteref>'ed by other
authors from the same institution.
(4) It would be nice if there was some kind of generic inline <name>
container for denoting the names of books or journals or companies
or ...
Typically these are rendered in italics. But because they are names,
<emphasis> isn't really appropriate. <phrase> seems too general and
may be overworked enough already.
<application> seems like a specific case of what probably
aught to be <name role="program">
(5) It might be nice if the <equation>, <inlineequation> and
<informalequation> elements provided an @type attribute to
distinguish between mathematical and chemical equations/reactions
and formulae. Perhaps "math"|"chem"|"nuclear?" with a default of "math"?
(actually, it would be very nice to be able to put text - punctuation
such as a full-stop or comma at the very least - on the same line
as an <equation> or <informalequation> )
(6) The <supplement> thing for centralising embedded related data in
other XML dialects.
(see http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/200507/msg00053.html)
Thats about it. What do you think?
Thanks
Doug
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]