Re: [docbook] docbook definition still based on DTD?

[Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>]

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   perhaps a silly question, but at the moment (as i read it), the
> definition of docbook is generally presented as the official DTD.
> however, there is also a schema for docbook and, given that schemas
> can represent things non-representable in simple DTDs, will there be
> a point where docbook (5.0?) can no longer be represented by a simple
> DTD?  or has that already happened?

Please see the following comparison:

http://www.docbook.org/docs/howto/#introduction-schemas

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

OpenPGP digital signature