[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Letting components be empty
On 23.7.2011 22:22, Bob Stayton wrote:
> db.component.contentmodel =
> (db.navigation.components*,
> db.toplevel.blocks.or.sections,
> db.navigation.components*) | (db.navigation.components)*
>
> The part before the "|" has to have something, but the part after does
> not. Does that relieve the ambiguity? And this could be expressed in
> DTD syntax as well, no?
I think that this still breaks UPA in XML schema because both groups
inside choice start with db.navigation.components.
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]