docbook message

Subject: Re: [docbook] Formal vs. informal

From: Thomas Schraitle <tom_schr@web.de>
To: docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:36:14 +0100

Hi,

On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:24:25 -0600
David Cramer <david@thingbag.net> wrote:

> Wrt this, I've always wondered about <procedure>. Was
> <informalprocedure> just way too long? Or did it predate the
> distinction?

Probably, because a title is optional in a procedure and there is no
need for an informalprocedure? Just guessing. :) 

http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/procedure.html

-- 
Gruß/Regards,
    Thomas Schraitle

References:
- Equations and figures as descendants of an example
  - From: Erik Leunissen <e.leunissen@hccnet.nl>
- Re: Equations and figures as descendants of an example
  - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Re: [docbook] Re: Equations and figures as descendants of an example
  - From: Erik Leunissen <e.leunissen@hccnet.nl>
- Re: Equations and figures as descendants of an example
  - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Re: [docbook] Re: Equations and figures as descendants of an example
  - From: davep <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
- Formal vs. informal
  - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Re: [docbook] Formal vs. informal
  - From: David Cramer <david@thingbag.net>