dss-x — archive

What is with the 1.0 in DSS-Defined Identifiers for v2.0?

From: Ernst Jan van Nigtevecht <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 05:24:00 -0000

Dear all, I would also prefer b) because the way the information is exchanged is changed as well. I noted in Section 9.2 one 1.0 identifier urn:oasis:names:tc:dss:1.0:resultminor:KeyInfoNotProvided Should this not be urn:oasis:names:tc:dss:2.0:resultminor:KeyInfoNotProvided Regards Ernst Jan [email protected] wrote: Dear all, I would prefer b). BR, dh ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Stefan Hagen Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Juni 2018 15:49 An: [email protected] Betreff: [dss-x] What is with the 1.0 in DSS-Defined Identifiers for v2.0? Dear Andreas and other members, what is with the 1.0 part of the identifiers in forma t URN we still list in section DSS-Defined identifiers? Option a) They remain, as the identifiers did not change across 2.0 Option b) They must be migrated to 2.0 (the pure DSS ones not other parties stuff Option c) Oh, dunno - let's discuss several meetings to find some number - na, not serious. I can live with either option (a) or (b) but need to know. Thanks a bucnh, Stefan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 31FB-BC7C-401F