[OASIS Issue Tracker] (DSSX-28) Public Comment 201809c00001s04: Improve readbility

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/DSSX-28?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andreas Kuehne updated DSSX-28:
-------------------------------
       Summary: Public Comment 201809c00001s04: Improve readbility  (was: Public Comment 201809c00001s04)
    Issue Type: Improvement  (was: Bug)
    Resolution: fixed as proposed

> Public Comment 201809c00001s04: Improve readbility
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DSSX-28
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/DSSX-28
>             Project: OASIS Digital Signature Services eXtended (DSS-X) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: PRD01
>            Reporter: Andreas Kuehne
>            Assignee: Andreas Kuehne
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: PRD01_COMMENT, TC_ESI
>             Fix For: csprd02
>
>
> Comments from TC ESI to OASIS DSS-X TC on DSS-X V2 - Â4 of 19 submitted by Liaison Andreas Kuehne on behalf of Sonia Companies via message Â[201809c00001|http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-x-comment/201809/msg00001.html]Âper attachment with accessibility issues (word file)
> {quote}following steering committee call on 17/09 and addition of 2 other editorial comments, the resulting pre-agreed comments are now for ESI approval for submission to OASIS DSS-X TC by 28 September
> {quote}
> h2. Comment Â#4:
> |Clause 4.2.6. SignRequest. When one reads the text âBelow follows a list of the sub-components that MAY be present within this component:â one thinks that it is misleading, as this component inherits from RequestBaseType and other sub-components may appear. At the end of all the requirements for the new subcomponents, the text fixes the situation âA set of sub-components is inherited from component 5.1.10 and is not repeated hereâ
> Â
> REQUEST: makes it clear since the very beginning that the sub-components of RequestBaseType and the new ones listed below may appear. Also include the name of the base type RequestBaseType and not only the clause number for facilitating reading.
> Â|
> |This situation appears in a good number (if not in all) those clauses where a type is derived from a base type.
> Â
> REQUEST: make changes in all these clauses as indicated above.|
> |CONCLUSION: Pass the comment to DSS-X.|



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.7.2#77003)