[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (DSSX-59) Date/Date-time modelling in JSON
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/DSSX-59?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=74743#comment-74743 ]
Andreas Kuehne commented on DSSX-59:
------------------------------------
That's definitly a severe flaw. Must be fixed!
> Date/Date-time modelling in JSON
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: DSSX-59
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/DSSX-59
> Project: OASIS Digital Signature Services eXtended (DSS-X) TC
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andreas Kuehne
> Assignee: Andreas Kuehne
> Priority: Major
>
> Received thru the DSS-X public comments list from Neil Crossley on the 2019-08-23:
> Â
> The JSON schema and Swagger schema are consistent in their modelling of date-time:
> Swagger:
> [https://swagger.io/docs/specification/data-models/data-types/#string]
> JSON schema draft 4 validation:
> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fge-json-schema-validation-00#section-7.3.1]
> JSON schema latest validation:
> [https://json-schema.org/latest/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.7.3.1]
> Â
> That is, time is represented as a string with a specific format. The JSON schema declaration looks like this:
> type: 'string'
> format: 'date-time'
> Instead, dss-core consistently employs the following:
> type: 'number'
> format: 'utc-millisec'
> The use of number instead of string does not conform to the standard. While a lossless transformation is possible, I would like to point out that this is a custom, non-standard declaration that may not always be supported by the employable tools.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.7.2#77003)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]