ebcore — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
NIST perpetuating wrong notion of ebXML and SOA
I just found this document from 2007.
Its out for review and comment:
Once again we see the notion of "complicated" being attached to ebXML - when in fact the reverse can be the case!
That ebXML contract and secure ebMS exchanges are better suited to much of what people want to do with SOA than a WSDL approach!
Suggest we can produce a Top Reasons to Use ebXML for 2009 and submit this as feedback to NIST
(similar to the format of this - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/30366/EML-Top-Reasons.pdf)
Happy 2009 Everyone!
Thanks, DW
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]