ebxml-msg — archive

[System]

 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















ebxml-msg message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: T2 PLEAE READ - Suggested solution to RM Issues




From: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
To: "'Miller, Robert (GXS)'" <Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com>,"ebXML Messaging (E-mail)" <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 09:53:40 -0700






Title: RE: T2 PLEAE READ - Suggested solution to RM Issues



Bob
 
See 
comments below. However I would like to repeate one point you made and my 
response up here ...

Change 11
---------
Summary: Include syncReply at both the Message Header and the 
NAD/Via
elements 
MILR: IMO, this is a substantive change (not V1.1) 

[David B] I think this is a bug. Without this the 
spec does not work properly when a message is sent through an intermediary as 
the TO Party cannot know whether to put the Delivery Receipt in the same message 
as the Business Response or separately. It is also, IMO not that substantive. 
Remember the criteria for including something in v 1.1 was that it should be a 
bug or a clarification. If we need to make "substantive" changes to fix a bug 
then we still have to make the changes.
 
 
David