ebxml-msg — archive

RE: T2 PLEASE READ - Suggested Change - add "From" Service and Actionto the header

From: System
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:56:00 -0000

William Using RefToMessageId only solves part of the problem. Specifically it does not solve the following ... 1. How does the recipient of a message know what to put in the Service and Action for the message they return in the absence of a CPA (this is from the Bank Payment example) 2. To use RefToMessageId, the sender of a message, where a reply is expected, would have no option but to save the data from the EVERY message even though the message was sent with deliverySemantics of BestEffort. This should not be necessary. How can it be avoided? 3. If you are using PartyId, Service and Action to route a message, how do you know which MSH at the Party should receive the message when Service and Action have fixed values (as in an error message)? With the current spec, a Party could only have one MSH ... even if it were IBM. As stated before we need solutions to ALL the problems unless you think the above are not problems. Regards David