ebxml-msg — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: T2 Retry with Delivery Receipt
Let's be perfectly clear on this. IBM MQSeries may be great but its design
is based on very different premises from ebXML-MS and it is much more than
an MSH-like thing. Because of the above, because it is not ebXML and
because it is proprietary middleware, mention of it has no place in the
ebXML-MS specification. I believe that the same is true of MS-MQ.
Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************
Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown
Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************
"David Fischer" <[email protected]> on 09/14/2001 02:44:17 PM
To:
"Christopher Ferris" <[email protected]>, Martin W
Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:
"Dan Weinreb" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: T2 Retry with Delivery Receipt
Chris,
What do you mean by unreliable? I will agree there is no unreliable IM but
there can be an IM which does not support ebXML RM (e.g. uses MQSeries
instead).
This is the whole point of the reliableMessageMethod parameter.
David Fischer
Drummond Group.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]