ebxml-msg — archive

[System]

The meaning of the value "Transport" is not defined for reliableMessagingMethod. I don't think there is universal agreement with your surmise. The usual meaning of the word "Transport" and the meaning intended almost everywhere in the MS spec. is the layer below ebXML-MS, and the only bindings that we have provided are for HTTP and SMTP, neither of which is reliable. If the team means that "Transport" means "Other" here, the spec should explain this point and, preferably, change the value to "Other". David Burdett take note. This is a comment on V1.1. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* "David Fischer" <david@drummondgroup.com> on 09/17/2001 12:55:30 AM To: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "Dan Weinreb" <dlw@exceloncorp.com> cc: <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: RE: non-ebXML links My understanding is that a value of reliableMessagingMethod="Transport" essentially means Other. There are other RM methods which can produce onceandonlyonce and not be ebXML. This is not the same as deliverySemantics="BestEffort" which really means no RM. David Fischer Drummond Group.