ebxml-msg — archive

[System]

right, I'm not advocating that the practice be used, but that it not be precluded, that's all. Cheers, Chris Ralph Berwanger wrote: > Chris, > I agree with the technique. I can even make a convincing > argument for including the capability. I would think that if a message > originator requested a signed receipt and did not elect to sign the > original document that the orignator would have a facility to validate > the signature value returned in the receipt. > I have a significant collection of legacy data and I am having > trouble processing this discussion in light of many previous debates, to > include those with members of the ABA and some elements of the Federal > Government. My issue boils down to, "I am concerned about the > perceptions it may spawn." This may not be sufficient enough reason to > vote against supporting the capability. I can remember early > discussions regarding dis-embodies signatures and the number of people > asking, "who would ever do that?" > > Ralph > >