emix — archive

Documents and SGIP

From: Edward Cazalet <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:12:00 -0000

Concerning recommended changes to emix submitted before the meeting, will these be ignored until after the PR? Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D. 101 First Street, Suite 552 Los Altos, CA 94022 650-949-5274 cell: 408-621-2772 [email protected] www.cazalet.com From: William Cox [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [emix] Documents and SGIP I would suggest that the WS-Calendar schemas be marked "informative" so there's no confusion that EMIX is defining them. This could be an annotation in the schemas or simply in the namespace document. Not sure how to do with "no change" but you seem to be contemplating replacing those with the PR02 WS-Calendar schemas. Thanks! bill -- William Cox Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax On 3/23/11 12:21 PM, Toby Considine wrote: It has been suggested that we put together a package of EMIX work to share with the Nashville SGIP meeting. If you read the recent interpretation of the rules (Monday night) then you know that it cannot include any changes or directions received in tomorrow’s meeting. You have all seen that EMIX (spec, schemas, and examples) was updated on Tuesday afternoon. If we want to share that work with the SGIP, then we should request a 2 week PR at the meeting. Please be on the meeting (we need an absolute majority to vote a PR), and familiar with the latest documents and artifacts. In particular, I propose that a Public Review be based on http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/41575/emix-1-0-spec-wd20.pdf and http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/41576/emix-1-0-schemas-wd20.zip The note the other night stated that we must vote these documents, precisely, with no changes allowed of any kind. We must, unfortunately, continue to carry the WS-Calendar schemas forward in this package as it is unclear if that TC will be able to pull off a second PR vote as they are not scheduled to meet this week. If we are able to vote itout for PR, I will then propose that we distribute links and information to all PAP04, PAP04, and PAP09 (and the relevant DEWGS) before the weekend before the SGIP meeting. Thanks tc “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it” -- Upton Sinclair. Toby Considine TC9, Inc OASIS Technical Advisory Board TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee Email: [email protected] Phone: (919)619-2104 http://www.tcnine.com/ blog: www.NewDaedalus.com