emix — archive

[Anne Hendry <49388a5276025649ac24af97adb9da627127240d6f@facmailmb3.facilities.unc.edu>]

I'm talking only about the vote only. The vote is to approve changes specifically to those two schemas (within the package). I guess you can look at it as clarifying the word 'corrected' in your original statement: €œThe TC approve the corrected schemas, and direct the TC Administrator issue the Public Review using the corrected schemas € specifically stating what was corrected. If you're giving them an entirely new package then the last part of that sentence should probably be ... and direct the TC Administrator issue the Public Review with an updated package containing the (or these) corrected schemas € The TC Admin may have some input/requirements on the terminology for this. -A Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT) wrote, On 4/26/2011 2:05 PM: 49388A5276025649AC24AF97ADB9DA627127240D6F@facmailmb3.facilities.unc.edu type= cite > That is correct. Only those two schemas, with the diffs, are changed. As for the motion to the TC-Admin, it is my sense that they prefer to receive a single package, rather than direction to replace one, keep the next, replace a third, etc. It is the theory that decides what can be observed. - Albert Einstein Toby Considine Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee Facilities Technology Office University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu Phone: (919)962-9073 http://www.oasis-open.org blog: www.NewDaedalus.com