emix — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Transactive State
In which EI service calls would Transactive State be communicated? -A
Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT) wrote, On 6/2/2011 1:53 PM: 49388A5276025649AC24AF97ADB9DA627128B4F98E@facmailmb3.facilities.unc.edu
type= cite
>
EMIX is not a process, and not a prescribed set of steps, and specifies no service calls.
It is the theory that decides what can be observed . - Albert Einstein
Toby Considine
Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee
U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee
Facilities Technology Office University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC
Email:
Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
Phone: (919)962-9073
http://www.oasis-open.org
blog: www.NewDaedalus.com
From:
Anne Hendry [ mailto:[email protected] ]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 4:50 PM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: [emix] Transactive State
Transactive State as described in spec wd26:
As parties use EMIX to come to an agreement and transact energy, the information required changes. An initial offer may not have a price. An agreement may not yet have a performance date. It is necessary for both parties in any communication to understand the Transactive State, i.e. what level of agreement defines the current communication .
It seems like what is being said with the Transactive State enumeration is that in order to make sense of the information that is being conveyed in a transaction one would need to know what Transactive State one was in. However, wouldn't this be obvious by where you are in sequence of Service calls (and not need to be repeated as an indicator element in EMIX)?
In which EI service calls would Transactive State be communicated?
Thanks,
-Anne
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]