kmip-interop-tech — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Key Value Location alternatives
All,
I’ve realized that there are two ways of expressing the Key Value Location in terms of the (new)
KMIP tags. I don’t have a preference and was wondering if anyone can provide an argument one way or the other.
When a client sends a Register request with an MDO key and wants to specify the location of the key value it can be done in the following two ways:
<Request Message, Header, Batch Item, Operation, …
>
Tag: Template-Attribute (0x420091), Type: Structure (0x01), Data:
Tag: Key Value Location (0x4200B8), Type: Structure (0x01), Data:
Tag: Key Value Location Value (0x4200BA), Type: Text String (0x07), Data: HSM-12345
Tag: Key Value Location Type (0x4200B9), Type: Enumeration (0x05), Data: 0x00000001
<Other attributes, Object>
Or
<Request Message, Header, Batch Item, Operation, …
>
Tag: Template-Attribute (0x420091), Type: Structure (0x01), Data:
Tag: Attribute (0x420008), Type: Structure (0x01), Data:
Tag: Attribute Name (0x42000A), Type: Text String (0x07), Data: Key Value Location
Tag: Attribute Value (0x42000B), Type: Structure (0x01), Data:
Tag: Key Value Location Value (0x4200BA), Type: Text String (0x07), Data: HSM-12345
Tag: Key Value Location Type (0x4200B9), Type: Enumeration (0x05), Data: 0x00000001
<Other attributes, Object>
What in your opinion is the more appropriate way to express the fact that the key location is at HSM-12345?
Thank you,
Denis
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]