OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  legalxml-courtfiling  ·  2002-08

legalxml-courtfiling — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Salt Lake minutes


I tend to agree that within the context of the work of the TC as it has developed, the issue of redaction is a matter of court policy and not lawyer desktop control, as Diane suggested. Court Policy XML is a design concept that allows a court in theory to post the equivalent of its Local Rules in XML format and allow the filers and infomediaries through real-time interaction with machine processes to conform to the Local Court Rules. Within this paradigm, John Greacen is therefore correct that the redaction requirements should be established by courts as a matter of Court Policy XML. Whether lawyers will find this model acceptable or they will require other processes that will allow them to retain desktop control remains to be seen.

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]