legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Party or Actor
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Party or Actor
- From: Allen Jensen <[email protected]>
- To: [email protected], [email protected],[email protected]
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:16:03 -0700
Either way, these tags are just for transmission of data between systems, not presentation to the user. Whatever any CMS chooses to term the field data to their users is what they display to the user. XML Tags are just for the techies to know which fields to place all the database data into that is being transmitted. Allen Jensen Internet / E-Filing Development Orange County Superior Court (949) 476-4984 >>> John Messing <[email protected]> 09/22/02 10:21PM >>> I prefer exactly the opposite. I would like to see developed a Party object and a non-Party object. The first could include persons, property (for American practice involving in rem and forfeiture actions), and entities. The second could include witnesses, lawyers, judges, staff, victims, etc. Usually judges are interested first in who is and who is not a litigant before the Court. Basic treatment and consideration is based upon this distinction. The objects should be crafted accordingly. Another equivalent term could be litigants and non-litigants. Regards.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]