OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  legalxml-courtfiling  ·  2002-09

legalxml-courtfiling — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object


 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object


Title: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object
It is the semantics. It sounds like the clear consensus is for "party" to have the more limited meaning of "party to a case" rather than a broader meaning. I definitely agree that "party" should have the more limited meaning it customarily receives in court proceedings.
 
As for a term to describe the broader meaning, I have no preference between "actor" or "participant". I confess to being unclear about the benefit or need for a single high level element like "actor" or "participant."
 
Rolly


[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]