legalxml-courtfiling — archive

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] [Fwd: ECF 1.1 spec testing status repo rtfrom King County, Washington]

From: System
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:36:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] [Fwd: ECF 1.1 spec testing status repo	rtfrom King County, Washington]




From: [email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:34:52 -0700






The problem with ambiguous elements that Catherine discusses in several
places in her report reminds me of the comment by Dr. Leff in his ebXML
liaison report about the rest of the world using a "construction" approach
to element definition instead of our "restriction" approach.  Revising our
standards accordingly to use the construction approach should resolve some
of the existing implementation ambiguities and make the standards more
interoperable.