legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Interoperability test requirements for ECF1.1
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Interoperability test requirements for ECF1.1
- From: "Krause, Catherine" <[email protected]>
- To: 'Dallas Powell' <[email protected]>, [email protected],[email protected], [email protected]
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:33:11 -0700
Title: Message
|
I
(unfortunately) haven't had time to review Dallas' original proposal regarding
conformance levels, but I agree with his suggestion below that case initiation
should be a separate conformance level from filing fees (so, I concur that
level 3 & 4 should remain separated).
We are
specifically planning to first implement initiation of cases via an e-filing
with those case types that do not require a filing fee, postponing the need to
integrate an e-commerce component into our system. We felt we would like
to deal with the complexities of case initiation prior to introducing additional
complexity of filing fees (the types of issues Dallas notes in his
message).
Catherine Krause
E-Filing Project Manager
King County Department of Judicial
Administration
(206)296-7860
|