legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Cancellation of proposed ballot on OXCI options
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Cancellation of proposed ballot on OXCI options
- From: "T J Smith" <[email protected]>
- To: "Dallas Powell" <[email protected]>,"Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:01:06 -0800
|
John,
I share Dallas's views on this topic.
The
OXCI project managers can obviously do whatever they want to do, and in this
instance have done so after the TC spent the entirety of the last conference
determining to consider the merits of another alternative. It has not yet had
the opportunity to do so, and yet a decision has been made.
I
personally believe that the "solution" OXCI has selected resolves only the first
of a series of technical problems inherent in its fundamental approach, and so I
wonder how much more of the TC's time will be spent nursing OXCI as additional
problems surface. I've also questioned whether the TC's interests are well
served by considering a project to build a "standards-compliant" application in
the absence of those standards, with the expectation that the application in
question will somehow easily accommodate whatever eventually emerges from the
TC. The current discussion about whether an envelope is even needed should
suggest how ill-founded that premise is. But that should be a problem for
the OXCI project managers and funders to worry about, and not absorb the already
sparse resources of this TC in my opinion.
The TC
has requested status reports from Christopher Smith of the California AOC since
the 2GEFS project was announced. Those specifications are now released, and it
seems to me that their consideration has a prior claim on the TC's time. I for
one believe the TC's efforts will be better rewarded as a consequence, and
in so doing it stands a far better chance of producing a set of usable standards
in a reasonable time frame.
Tom Smith
|