OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  legalxml-courtfiling  ·  2004-02

legalxml-courtfiling — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Cancellation of proposed ballot on OXCI options


 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Cancellation of proposed ballot on OXCI options


John, I share Dallas's views on this topic.
 
The OXCI project managers can obviously do whatever they want to do, and in this instance have done so after the TC spent the entirety of the last conference determining to consider the merits of another alternative. It has not yet had the opportunity to do so, and yet a decision has been made.
 
I personally believe that the "solution" OXCI has selected resolves only the first of a series of technical problems inherent in its fundamental approach, and so I wonder how much more of the TC's time will be spent nursing OXCI as additional problems surface. I've also questioned whether the TC's interests are well served by considering a project to build a "standards-compliant" application in the absence of those standards, with the expectation that the application in question will somehow easily accommodate whatever eventually emerges from the TC. The current discussion about whether an envelope is even needed should suggest how ill-founded that premise is. But that should be a problem for the OXCI project managers and funders to worry about, and not absorb the already sparse resources of this TC in my opinion.
 
The TC has requested status reports from Christopher Smith of the California AOC since the 2GEFS project was announced. Those specifications are now released, and it seems to me that their consideration has a prior claim on the TC's time. I for one believe the TC's efforts will be better rewarded as a consequence, and in so doing it stands a far better chance of producing a set of usable standards in a reasonable time frame.
 
Tom Smith
650.591.1795 (Ofc)
650.346.7689 (Mobile)
650.591.1425 (Fax)
 


[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]