legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Information about the GJXDM
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Information about the GJXDM
- From: "Poindexter, Gary" <[email protected]>
- To: "Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:20:25 +0100
|
My interpretation of the documentation provided on
the referenced page is that the requirement is not simply "...required to use
the gjxdm..." "Compliance" as defined on the same page includes how the
schemas will be constructed using the subset generation tool and extended using
the documented "rules" (presumable DTDs are not "compliant"). I'm
interested in knowing if others agree or disagree with my interpretation of
the definition and if you agree, how you feel about this
definition of compliance.
gary
poindexter
BearingPoint
|