legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] "Must vote" for TC voting members
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] "Must vote" for TC voting members
- From: Jim Beard <[email protected]>
- To: Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:29:37 -0800
Roger and all,
On Jan 5, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Winters, Roger wrote:
The "Blue Drafting" committee was defined to work with the products of the requirements group, the discussions from the face-to-face and telephone meetings of the technical committee, and the discussions that will take place on the "Blue Drafting" committee's own e-mail group (to be formed once chartered), and begin (with our hired consultant) to produce (draft) the "Blue" specification.
So the "Blue Drafting" committee will consist of parties that are developing based on the products of the Requirements committee? That makes sense, but doesn't seem to fall under the definition of "Blue Drafting" that comes to mind for me.
You mention that the group will "begin to produce the 'Blue' specification". What format do you imagine the Specification to take? It seems to me that the Requirements subcommittee will be making documentation and schemas. To me, documentation and Schemas form a specification. That's why I am confused. As I understand it the requirements committee is making the specifications. Also, all of the deliverables outlined in the "Blue Drafting" committee are 'reviews'. There are no defined documents to be delivered. So again, I'm confused as to what the committee is supposed to do.
The first part of you response, which led me to believe that the Blue Drafting committee would be developing, using and providing feedback on what the Requirements committee produces makes sense. However if that is the whole intent, I would suggest renaming it to the "Blue Review" committee...
�
Regards,
�
Roger
�
Roger Winters
Programs and Projects Manager
King County
Department of Judicial Administration
516 Third Avenue, E-609 MS: KCC-JA-0609
Seattle, Washington 98104
V: (206) 296-7838 F: (206) 296-0906
COMING SOON!
<image.tiff>
John M. Greacen
Greacen Associates, LLC
HCR 78, Box 23
Regina, New Mexico 87046
505-289-2164
505-289-2163 (fax)
505-780-1450 (cell)
�Jim Beard
counterclaim.com, Inc
http://www.counterclaim.com
http://openefm.sourceforge.net
(800) 264-8145
- References:
- RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] "Must vote" for TC voting members
- From: "Winters, Roger" <[email protected]>
- RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] "Must vote" for TC voting members
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]