legalxml-courtfiling — archive

Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] "Must vote" for TC voting members

From: Jim Beard
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:09:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] "Must vote" for TC voting members




From: Jim Beard <[email protected]>
To: Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:25:13 -0800






So if the point of the Blue Drafting Subcommittee is to have a formal  
mailing list for discussion of the work product of the Requirements  
Subcommittee, why not just make a new mailing list for it?  Why go  
through the hassle of having an entirely new subcommittee?  Also, why  
wouldn't the Requirements mailing list be appropriate for this  
discussion?

Jim

On Jan 5, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Scott Came wrote:

> Let me make an attempt at clarification...
>
> One reason for creating the Blue Drafting Subcommittee was to have a  
> separate, OASIS-sanctioned mailing list for formal discussion of the  
> artifacts being developed by the Requirements Subcommittee.  This is  
> opposed to general discussion of efiling and other TC business, which  
> continues to take place on the main TC list.  That is, on the drafting  
> list you post specific proposals for modifying the artifacts as they  
> develop.
>
> The idea, I believe, is to have the drafting subcommittee be a  
> committee of the whole.
>
> --Scott
>