legalxml-courtfiling — archive

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Groups - Component Issue resolution conference call added

From: James Cusick
To: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:55:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Groups - Component Issue resolution conference call added




From: "Cusick, James" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:56:53 -0500






Folks,

I would just like to state my preference in resolving this. I would
prefer not to see any use of the term component or a substitute. I would
prefer that the standard define the functionalities of a generic filing
system and an interface (API) to that system. The decomposition of the
system into components is a step for the implementer to take not
something for the standard to define. I would like to see the standard
talk about a filer (or filing client) and a filing system (or server). I
can imagine a scenario where diverse filing clients talk to diverse
filing systems which may implement the standard interfaces in diverse
ways. It may be necessary to discuss a CMS as well. This might be seen
as another client or a cooperating server. With these three entities I
think a useful standard could be described. Additionally, it might be
useful to describe the interface to a payment system (another server). 

Looking forward to the discussion.

Regards,
james