legalxml-courtfiling — archive

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda item

From: James Cusick
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:48:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda item




From: "Cusick, James" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>,"Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:48:22 -0400









Just a question on the use of the term "fragment", do we 
mean to suggest that an incomplete XML document could be transmitted? would that 
be ill formed? jc



  
  
  From: John M. Greacen 
  [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 6:47 
  PM
To: Electronic Court Filing Technical 
  Committeee
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda 
  item


  
  
  Please post your comments by nest 
  Tuesday on the following architecture for the Court Filing Blue message 
  structure proposed by Scott Came.
  
  
  
  
  John 
  M. Greacen
  Greacen 
  Associates, LLC
  HCR 
  
  
  505-289-2164
  505-289-2163 
  (fax)
  505-780-1450 
  (cell)
  [email protected]
  












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]