legalxml-courtfiling — archive

[Dallas Powell]

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda item




From: "Dallas Powell" <dpowell@tybera.com>
To: <john@greacen.net>,"Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:51:40 -0600









It is my understanding that we have agreed 
that the standard is not restricted to one specific Communication layer.  
With that in mind, we should take the SOAP Message Package out of 
the discussion.  I also believe in previous discussions that we 
agreed to allow the documents to be embedded in the body or to be 
included as attachments such as that which is defined below.  I would 
anticipate that there should be two diagrams depending on which one an 
implementation desires otherwise we are binding ourselves to require the SOAP 
messaging layer as identified in your diagram.
 
Also, from my previous message I believe that 
the standard clearly needs to define version controls which I think should 
reside in the SOAP Header area.  The standard also needs to define how that 
process works with intermediary nodes.  
 
Dallas