legalxml-courtfiling — archive

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] New Proposed Service Models for ECF3

From: James Cabral
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 01:11:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] New Proposed Service Models for ECF3




From: "Cabral, James E." <[email protected]>
To: "Dallas Powell" <[email protected]>,"Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:11:12 -0700






Title: Please review 'Proposed Service Models for ECF3'



Dallas,
 
Here is a revision that I think solves the issues you 
identified.  I think we still need the query in Model B so that eService A 
can decide to serve something that will not be part of the court 
record.  By separating out the MDE that responds to the query (I called it 
the "eService Registry") and the central MDE that serves the other participants, 
I think it aligns the two models.  
 
  
jim



From: Dallas Powell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 5:28 PM
To: 'Electronic Court 
Filing Technical Committeee'
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] New 
Proposed Service Models for ECF3



Here is what I think we said today regarding the 
eService.  As I wrote the document I found several issues that need to be 
addressed.
 
Dallas
Secondary Service V2 - jec.doc












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]