legalxml-courtfiling — archive
Comments on WS MP
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Comments on WS MP
- From: "Scott Came" <[email protected]>
- To: [email protected]
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Jim and TC:
Apologies for not getting these comments out sooner, but I do have the following comments on the Web Services Messaging Profile:
Line 273:� The WS-I Basic Profile requires that the receiver of a message not rely on the SOAPAction header for processing of the message.� Given that, I wonder why we are requiring that it be used.� From an implementer's point of view, SOAPAction is generally ignored and of little value, since per WS-I BP all information vital to processing has to be included in the SOAP Body anyway.� I recommend we rewrite section 2.5 so that the WS MP relies only on http request/response to satisfy this profile requirement.
(Similar comment applies to lines 280-281).
Line 283: I find this section confusing.� The purpose of this profile requirement is to make sure profiles have a way of delimiting between the message and attachments, and between attachments.� All we need to do here is refer to WS-I BP and WS-I Attachments profile, which in turn rely on SOAP 1.1 and SOAP with Attachments.� Those specifications require MIME boundaries between the message and attachments, and between individual attachments.� I recommend that this section be rewritten per the above to clarify it.
I will be on the call from 10-10:25, and would be happy to discuss these points at that time.
Thanks.
--Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]