legalxml-sc — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Request for Closure: RE: [legalxml-sc] IP wording in LegalXML Cou rtFiling proposal
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->legalxml-sc message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Request for Closure: RE: [legalxml-sc] IP wording in LegalXML Cou rtFiling proposal
- From: "Bergeron, Donald L. (LNG)" <[email protected]>
- To: "Bergeron, Donald L. (LNG)" <[email protected]>,"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:10:26 -0400
I believe that the change is not a substantive one and only reflects the reality that we are not omnipotent and omnipresent. We will need an explicit statement from a member of OASIS management, that this is a technical clarification and that it does not affect the substance or in any way narrow any interpretation of this clause in terms of assuring that our standards remain open. I can live with this language as can John Greacen based on my phone call yesterday. Dragging this out is not improving things. To push further at this time, I believe is not a good idea. Steering Committee - Please communicate your position by EOD. Karl could you draft the confirmation I am requesting? Regards, Don
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]