legalxml-sc — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-sc] RE: [board] proposal for LegalXML eNotarization TC
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->legalxml-sc message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] RE: [board] proposal for LegalXML eNotarization TC
- From: Daniel Greenwood <[email protected]>
- To: Patrick Gannon <[email protected]>,"Karl F. Best" <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:12:45 -0400
Speaking for the contracts group alone, please use just "eContracts" for now. I decided to be a bit more explicit in the title of the Charter, but there is no reason not to use the short-hand (I believe everyone now knows what "e" stands for). There was some desire to drop the "e" from our name during the discussion phase, and I intend to revisit that idea after we get started. But for now, please stick with "eContracts". It would not bother me if other TCs decided to select a different usage. Thanks, - Dan
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]