legalxml-sc — archive

RE: [legalxml-sc] URGENT: potential problem with RoP

From: Eddie O'Brien
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:14:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















legalxml-sc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] URGENT: potential problem with RoP




From: Eddie O'Brien <[email protected]>
To: "'Karl F. Best'" <[email protected]>,[email protected]
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:12:16 -0400






IMHO I think this is the appropriate voting structure although there
will be significant resistance given the LegalXML membership and our
voting history.

Perhaps a voting system that included everyone based on a division of
the members status, i.e. a private member paid $250 and IBM paid $9,500.
Therefore IBM gets 38 votes and John Smith gets 1 vote? 

Sound a bit like gerrymandering?