legalxml-sc — archive
RE: [legalxml-sc] RE: [legalxml-ms] Transcripts TC membership needed
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-sc message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] RE: [legalxml-ms] Transcripts TC membership needed
- From: "Winters, Roger" <[email protected]>
- To: "'Bergeron, Donald L. (LNG-DAY)'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, 'SC' <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:21:20 -0800
Title: RE: [legalxml-sc] RE: [legalxml-ms] Transcripts TC membership needed
I'll chime in to agree with Don on this. There are many kinds of transcripts, not always related to a court case. In our court, and no doubt others, the verbatim transcript of proceedings is not considered part of the court file, so it would be inappropriate to group it with other documents that would be filed there. It is, of course, a form of record for the court, but it's handled differently, even with different custodians. Don's observation about the vocabulary issue is critical, so I also say "Ditto!" to that.
Roger
Roger Winters
Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Coordinator
and
Electronic Court Records Manager
King County
Department of Judicial Administration
516 Third Avenue, E-609 MS: KCC-JA-0609
Seattle, Washington 98104
V: (206) 296-7838 F: (206) 296-0906
[email protected]